INFORMATION AND INSIGHTS ON MIDDLE EAST DEVELOPMENTS
NATIONAL COUNCIL ON U.S. ARAB RELATIONS AND
THE U.S.-GCC CORPORATE COOPERATION COMMITTEE SECRETARIAT

PERSPECTIVES
WEEK OF JANUARY 28-FEBRUARY 3, 2002

REFORGING THE U.S. AND SAUDI STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP


A key "GulfWire" objective is to help keep you abreast of the challenges to the relationships between the United States and its strategic partners in the Gulf Cooperation Council member states.  The September 11th attack on America and Operation Enduring Freedom have focused new attention on U.S. foreign relations - across the Middle East in broad terms, and specifically with U.S.-Saudi Arabia ties.

"GulfWire Digest" and "GulfWire Voices of the Region" have chronicled for you the drumbeat of reporting, analysis and commentary on the challenges to the U.S.-Saudi Arabia relationship in recent months.  Today we are pleased to add to the dialogue with Dr. Anthony Cordesman's thoughtful essay, "Reforging The US And Saudi Strategic Partnership."  It follows close behind his "Fix the Saudi Relationship," in the January 24, 2002 "Christian Science Monitor." [Link below]

Dr. Anthony H. Cordesman, who holds the Arleigh Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, provides herein an insightful discussion of the challenges to the U.S.-Saudi Arabia relationship.  A veteran of more than thirty years of U.S. government services in the U.S. executive and legislative branches, and a popular media commentator, he has authored numerous cutting-edge works related to the strategic dimensions of Mideastern civilian and defense challenges.  In this essay, he focuses on the strategic relationship in terms of the current challenge, why it must be repaired and how to move forward.

Patrick W. Ryan
Editor-in-Chief, GulfWire

NOTE:

Additional tables accompanying “Reforging The US and Saudi Strategic Partnership” can be viewed on-line at:   CLICK HERE

=========================================================================

REFORGING THE US AND SAUDI STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

Anthony H. Cordesman
Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy

February 1, 2002

It is all too easy for the US and Saudi Arabia to lash out in anger at a time when the impact of September 11th, the Second Intifada, and the problems of dealing with Iran and Iraq divide us. It is easy to talk of withdrawing US forces, and breaking up a partnership that is more than a half century old. We need to remember that the US and Saudi Arabia have been friends and allies since the end of World War II. We fought the Gulf War together, and the US uses Saudi bases daily to contain Saddam Hussein. Saudi Arabia depends on US military equipment, advisors, and technical support for its military strength. We are major trading partners.  We are using Saudi oil to expand our Strategic Petroleum Reserve.  Saudi Arabia has often played a major role in stabilizing oil prices and in increasing oil production to deal with cuts in production in other countries.

Yes, the Saudi leadership could and should have done more to fight terrorism before September 11th. It should have paid much closer attention to the flow of private money to Islamic "charities," and to what some 10,000 young Saudi men who had received some kind of religious extremist and paramilitary training as "Afghanis" were doing. It should have paid much closer attention to a pattern of "Islamic education" in Saudi Arabia that often violated the basic principles of Islam by teaching xenophobia and distrust of Christians and Jews.

Months have gone by since September 11th, however, and we should move beyond the stage of venting our anger.  The friendship and mutual interests that have been the hallmark of a strong Saudi-US alliance should, once again, distinguish America's relationship with Saudi Arabia.  Both sides can reassert the primacy of these mutual interests by focusing on what we share: the experience and understanding that extreme fundamentalism of any kind endangers both civilization and civility.  

Strengthening Our Strategic Partnership

What we need to do is to strengthen our partnership with Saudi Arabia, not weaken it. We need to preserve our military ties. It is all too easy to talk about withdrawing US forces from Saudi Arabia. The fact is, however, that the de facto US-Saudi military alliance now consists primarily of: US advisors which are absolutely critical to Saudi Arabia's military development and effectiveness; one relatively small mix of air units that help enforce the Northern "no fly zone" from Prince Sultan Air Base in an unpopulated area south of Riyadh; a very small number of US personnel that work with the Saudi Air Force in maintaining an ultra-modern command and control facility in Riyadh; and a small number of US Army personnel that can operate Patriot units providing Saudi Arabia with its only ability to counter theater ballistic missiles in an emergency.

A few reality checks: Iran and Iraq are both major proliferators with chemical and biological weapons and which are seeking nuclear weapons. Iran has over 500,000 active military personnel, 350,000 reserves, some 2,500 tanks and armored fighting vehicles, a significant navy and nearly 300 combat aircraft. Iraq has over 400,000 active military personnel, 650,000 reserves, some 3,500 tanks and armored fighting vehicles, a significant navy and over 300 combat aircraft. Saudi Arabia has only 126,000 regular soldiers plus 75,000 men in a lightly mechanized national guard.  It has about 1,900 operational armored vehicles and around 350 combat aircraft, but its readiness and combat readiness is still low. In part because it is still absorbing some $65 billion in weapons deliveries since the Gulf War, which includes nearly $30 billion worth of very advanced US arms. 

The Critical Impact on the Global Economy

Iran and Iraq not only pose a potential threat to the entire Gulf region, with some two-thirds of the world's proven oil reserves, Saudi Arabia alone is critical to ensuring the flow of world oil and supporting the global economy.  Estimates of the size and importance of Saudi oil reserves differ slightly according to source. The US government estimates that Saudi Arabia proper (excluding the Saudi-Kuwaiti "Neutral Zone") contains at least 262 billion barrels of proven oil reserves or 25.4% of the world supply.  This compares with 11% for Iraq, 9.6% for the UAE, 9.2% for Kuwait, 8.6% for Iran, 13% for the rest of OPEC, and 22.6% for the rest of the world. It's the fact that Gulf oil reserves are so large that explains why the US Department of Energy estimates that Gulf oil exports will rise by 125% between 2000 and 2020 to meet the world's need for energy and from 30.6% to 47.9% of all world oil exports. It's the fact that Saudi oil reserves are so large that explains why some estimates indicate that Saudi oil production capacity will rise from 14.5% of all world capacity in 2000 to 19.2% of the world's total capacity by 2020.

Dealing with Military Threats and Terrorism

Defending the most critical source of the world's oil exports and reserves requires at least several thousand Americans to help train and support the Saudi forces, and it requires constant joint exercises and planning to prepare both Saudi and US forces for war. A relatively token US presence in Saudi Arabia allows Saudi and US forces to develop interoperability and ensures the US can rapidly and massively reinforce from over-the-horizon in a major crisis. Deterring Iraq requires tangible American presence, and dealing with Iranian and Iraqi proliferation will require new forms of US and Saudi cooperation in the future. It is all too easy to ignore military realities; to give way to the protests of those Saudis and Americans who simply do not understand the benefits of our alliance; or to over-react to the Saudi Islamists and other ideologues that have opposed our military ties since the time of Nasser. The US and Saudi Arabia need to do a much better job of explaining their military relationship to both the Saudi and American people.

At the same time, we need to develop more effective cooperation in the war on terrorism:

First, we must cooperate in replacing the Taliban government in Afghanistan with a government that has the aid and support to evolve towards a modern state serving the needs of all its peoples. Afghanistan must no longer be a nation that breeds or harbors terrorists.  This requires more than US and European efforts at nation building. It requires Saudi aid and the support of a major Islamic nation that can help to heal the tension between Afghan and Arab that grew out of the cruelty and extremism of Al Qaida and the Taliban. Saudi Arabia has already taken important steps in this direction and much deeper cooperation should be possible.

Second, we must work together to root out Al Qaida and other violent terrorist groups that pollute the very name of Islam throughout the Middle East and Central Asia, and ensure the financing and support of Islamic causes serves faith, not murder. Saudi Arabia can do much in the Gulf and the Arab world, as well as inside Saudi Arabia, to ensure that funds the flow in the name of Islamic charity are not actually used to serve extremist and terrorist causes. There is a need for Saudi diplomatic and political pressure on Gulf and Arab states to put an end to the activities of all of the remaining cells and elements of Al Qaida, and for Saudi religious leadership that makes it clear that murder, suicide bombings, and acts of mass terrorism cannot be justified in the name of Islam. 

Third, we must cooperate in a broader strategy to isolate terrorist regimes worldwide. Several such regimes are in the Middle East. We can only deal with the regimes with a minimum of conflict and violence if the United States and Saudi Arabia work together, rather than work against one another.  

The Problem of Iraq

Such a cooperative effort will probably allow us to deal with states like Iran, Libya, and Syria without violence. They are all evolving in ways that are at least somewhat positive. More marginal supporters or "tolerators" of terrorism like Lebanon, Somalia, the Sudan, and Yemen are already taking at least some steps to crack down on Al Qaida and other extremist groups. Concerted US and Saudi diplomatic and economic action can do even more to make it clear that none of these nations will tolerate groups that target and kill innocent civilians of any faith or indoctrinate and send Arab young men to a pointless death.

Such a broader strategy does, however, mean developing a common approach to either truly defanging or removing Saddam Hussein. The regime of Saddam Hussein is just as bad now as it was at its birth. It still shows no real concern for the Iraqi people except as political and military tools. It still continues to threaten Kuwait, and to covertly proliferate in ways that will eventually pose a threat to Saudi Arabia's very existence if allowed to continue. Too many years have passed while we have tried to deal with Saddam Hussein by setting "redlines" that gave him ways to avoid truly accepting the key terms of the UN resolutions.  Iran, the Gulf countries -- and most of all the people of Iraq -- have suffered enough at the hands of this lethal regime. 

Saudi Arabia and the US share common concerns about civilian casualties and the costs confronting us in the elimination of Saddam Hussein. However, compromise and temporizing has failed. It is barely possible that we can work together with our other allies to force Iraq into a form of containment where he accepts UN efforts demanding enough to actually seek out and destroy its chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons and long-range delivery systems. If not, the US and Saudi Arabia need to quietly agree on how to remove Saddam from power and on military cooperation to do so.

Such cooperation will be difficult, but not impossible. We will need to convince Saudi Arabia we are serious this time, we will not rely on empty facades like the Iraqi opposition and we will use enough US air and land power to ensure a quick and decisive victory. We need to persuade Saudi Arabia that Iraq's territorial integrity will be preserved, that pro-Iranian Shi'ites will not dominate it, and that Saddam's departure will be followed by the kind of nation building effort that will create a stable neighbor on Kuwait and Saudi Arabia's border. Saudi Arabia fought with us against Saddam's aggression.  It has been a constant critic of Saddam's regime, and Saudi Arabia has many incentives to at least quietly cooperate in Saddam's removal.

The Challenge of the Second Intifada

The US and Saudi Arabia must work together to address several broader causes of terrorism. One is the Arab-Israeli conflict.  Both sides in the Second Intifada are spinning out of control, and need help to create a meaningful future. The US cannot deal with a war between two peoples, and the hatreds it engenders, simply as if one side were guilty of "terrorism," or by standing aside because there are no easy opportunities or options that will satisfy either side.  It must not sacrifice Israel's vital interests, but it must also understand the overwhelming pressures on the Arab peoples and their governments created by Palestinian's who are stateless. 

We need to ask moderate Arab states like Saudi Arabia to join us in a continuing effort to create a ceasefire and then a peace that truly gives Israel security while creating a truly viable Palestinian state. Both nations may disagree on who deserves blame for the Second Intifada and many details of a peace. Both should be able to agree on the need to cooperate in replacing the war process of the Second Intifada with a peace process that gives Israel true security while creating a true Palestinian State. This will - as senior Saudi officials suggest - mean more US pressure on Israel. The US must make a more serious effort to put an end to the expansion of Israeli settlements and ensure Israeli flexibility in accepting a cease-fire on realistic terms. Such cooperation also, however, means Saudi Arabia must put pressure on the Palestinians.  They must provide more open support for the kind of peace proposals made at Camp David and Tabah and make it clear that such a peace can be acceptable to Islam. It means a concerted Saudi effort to persuade Arafat and the Palestinians that the tolerance of terrorism in any form will block a lasting ceasefire indefinitely or make such a peace impossible. 

The Critical Importance of Saudi Economic Development

Finally, both governments need to address the key economic and demographic causes of terrorism. They must frankly and honestly recognize that oil wealth alone can no longer sustain even "rich" oil states like Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia's case, this means the Saudi leadership must cut back further on arms purchases and actually implement its economic reform plans. The Saudi regime must take on the Islamists and conservatives to create a modern educational system that will educate young Saudis for real jobs. It means more realistic efforts to reduce dependence on foreign labor and reduce the Saudi birth rate to reasonable levels. 

In the case of the US, the US needs to work closely with Saudi Arabia - as well as Egypt, Jordan and other moderate Arab states - to support their efforts at economic reform and diversification. The US must make a far more proactive effort to ensure the steady flow of private investment, the expansion of trade, and the kind of joint ventures that create jobs for young men and women. It needs to support Saudi Arabia in creating a solid and well-institutionalized dialogue between energy importers and exporters that can help stabilize prices and supply.

We are scarcely responsible for the economic and demographic problems of Saudi Arabia and the Middle East that are reducing per capita income and creating unemployment and instability. Saudi Arabia does, however, have valid economic reform plans and a real interest in joining the World Trade Organization.  It seeks to create an importer-exporter dialogue to stabilize oil prices and create a secure source of exports, and in opening up its economy to foreign investment. We cannot fight terrorism successfully unless we fight the causes of terrorism.  The key is not abstract theoretical efforts to export our political system but rather economic reform that will aid the region's people, modernize their society and economies, and prepare the way for political evolution.

Americans also need to understand that it is the Saudi royal family, Saudi educators and technocrats, and key Saudi businessmen who are trying to modernize a very conservative clergy and people. Calls for more representative government, more open media, and better human rights make sense. Calls for instant democracy are virtually mindless. Saudi Arabia is evolving its own path towards modernization, but it is being led towards that process in the face of opposition that could divide the country and block progress just as badly as did Khomeini's revolution in Iran.

We have been very clear over the last few months about what we intend to do to the bad guys.  We now need to become just as clear about what we can do 'with' the good guys. Our challenge is not a clash between civilizations or between the West and the Islamic world. It is rather a clash between those who work to build civilization and those who work to destroy it. Saudi Arabia is a key ally in this battle and we need each other - now and for years to come!  


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

DR. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN

Dr. Anthony H. Cordesman is Senior Fellow for Strategic Assessment at the
Center for Strategic and International Studies and Co-Director of the
Center's Middle East Program.  He is also a military analyst for ABC and a
Professor of National Security Studies at Georgetown University. He directs
the assessment of global military balance, strategic energy developments,
and CSIS' Dynamic Net Assessment of the Middle East.

Dr. Cordesman is the author of books on the military lessons of the
Iran-Iraq war as well as the Arab-Israeli military balance and the peace
process, a six-volume net assessment of the Gulf, transnational threats, and military developments in Iran and Iraq. He analyzes U.S. strategy and force plans, counter-proliferation issues, arms transfers, Middle Eastern
security, economic, and energy issues.

Dr. Cordesman served as a national security analyst for ABC News for the
1990-91 Gulf War, Bosnia, Somalia, Operation Desert Fox, and Kosovo. He was
the Assistant for National Security to Senator John McCain and a Wilson
Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars at the Smithsonian. He has
served in senior positions in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the
Department of State, the Department of Energy, and the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency. His posts include acting as the Civilian Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, Director of Defense Intelligence Assessment, Director of Policy, Programming, and Analysis in the Department of Energy, Director of Project ISMILAID, and as the Secretary of Defense's representative on the Middle East Working Group.

Dr. Cordesman has also served in numerous overseas posts. He was a member of the U.S. Delegation to NATO and a Director on the NATO International Staff, working on Middle Eastern security issues. He served in Egypt, Iran,
Lebanon, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and West Germany.  He has been an
advisor to the Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Forces in Europe, and has traveled extensively in the Gulf and North Africa.


HAVE YOU READ THESE BOOKS BY DR. ANTHONY CORDESMAN?

“Peace and War: The Arab-Israeli Military Balance Enters the 21st Century,” by Anthony H. Cordesman

  To learn more and to purchase the book CLICK HERE.
”Iraq: Sanctions and Beyond,” (CSIS Middle East Dynamic Net Assessment) by Anthony H. Cordesman, Ahmed S. Hashim

To learn more and to purchase the book CLICK HERE


CONTACT INFO
Center for Strategic and International Studies
1800 K Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 775-3270 
Acordesman@aol.com
  


RELATED MATERIAL

"FIX OUR SAUDI PARTNERSHIP"
Op-ed by Dr. Anthony H. Cordesman
[From the Jan. 24, 2002 "Christian Science Monitor"]
…a US presence - vital in helping Saudi Arabia modernize its forces, containing Iraq, and defending a region with two-thirds of the world's proven oil reserves - is well worth keeping… …the US and Saudi Arabia need to reassert the primacy of their mutual interests by ending their counterproductive public feuding and working together to fight terrorism…
Complete column…
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0124/p11s01-coop.html  

OTHER GULFWIRE APPEARANCES

"The West and the Arab World: Partnership or a 'Clash of Civilizations?'"

"Strategy in the Middle East: The Gap Between Strategic Theory and
Operational Reality"


"A Firsthand Look at Saudi Arabia Since 9-11"


"Iraq: A Dynamic Net Assessment"


"If We Fight Iraq: Iraq and Its Weapons of Mass Destruction"


"If We Fight Iraq: Iraq and the Conventional Military Balance"

"Escalating to Nowhere: The Israeli and Palestinian Strategic Failures"

"Reforging the U.S. and Saudi Strategic Partnership"

CSIS GULF IN TRANSITION PROJECT
"The CSIS Gulf in Transition Project is a major CSIS study, funded in part by the Smith Richardson Foundation. The project builds on the work done for the CSIS Strategic Energy Initiative, the CSIS Net Assessment of the Middle East, and the Gulf in Transition Project. It is being conducted in conjunction with a separate - but closely related -- study of Saudi Arabia - and Middle East Energy and Security Project.  The Gulf in Transition project is being conducted by Anthony H. Cordesman, the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, and has developed a series of reports recommending US polices towards the Gulf states. The core of these reports consists of a Policy Report that summarizes the recommendations made in the analysis, and a Main Report that provides the detailed analytic rationale for each recommendation."  

SAUDI ARABIA ENTERS THE 21ST CENTURY
"Project Introduction - CSIS is undertaking a new project to examine the trends shaping the future of Saudi Arabia and its impact on the stability of the Gulf. This project is supported by the Smith Richardson Foundation and builds on the work done for the CSIS Strategic Energy Initiative, the CSIS Net Assessment of the Middle East, and the Gulf in Transition Project. It is being conducted in conjunction with a separate - but closely related -- study called the Middle East Energy and Security Project."  

For more information on these projects, including links to a treasure of analytical reports, see:
CSIS GULF IN TRANSITION PROJECT
http://www.csis.org/burke/gulf/index.htm 
http://www.csis.org/gulf/index.html  
SAUDI ARABIA ENTERS THE 21ST CENTURY
http://www.csis.org/burke/saudi21/index.htm  
MIDDLE EAST ENERGY AND SECURITY
http://www.csis.org/burke/mees/index.htm 
THE MIDDLE EAST MILITARY BALANCE
http://www.csis.org/burke/mb/index.htm#mid 

=========================================================================
       FORWARD THIS NEWSLETTER TO YOUR FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES
=========================================================================
            -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
                   For more visit the GulfWire Web site:
                      http://arabialink.com/GulfWire  
            -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
***************************************************************************
                      TO SUBSCRIBE TO GULFWIRE GO TO
                http://www.arabialink.com/GulfWireSubscribe  
***************************************************************************

*************************
LAST LINES
*************************

Independent commentary provided in ‘GulfWire’ and materials contained in the linked Internet sites do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations or the U.S.-GCC Corporate Cooperation Committee.  News extracts and links contained in GulfWire have been reported in various media.  GulfWire and the National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations/U.S.-GCC Corporate Cooperation Committee have not independently verified the accounts referred to and do not vouch for their accuracy or the reliability of Internet links.

Internet links were active the day of publication in GulfWire.  Some
hyperlinks are longer than one line of text and may not properly ‘wrap
around’ in your email.  You may need to cut and paste these links to your
Web browser.

The ‘GulfWire’ is an information service of the National Council on
U.S.-Arab Relations and the U.S.-GCC Corporate Cooperation Committee
Secretariat.  Please feel free to forward this edition of the ‘GulfWire’ to
your friends and colleagues, and suggest additions to our mailing list.
CLICK HERE

For more information on the National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations and the
U.S.-GCC Corporate Cooperation Committee visit the web sites of the National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations and the U.S.-GCC Corporate Cooperation Committee or call (202)293-0801.

****************************************************************************
National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations
President and CEO: Dr. John Duke Anthony

U.S.-GCC Corporate Cooperation Committee
Secretary: Dr. John Duke Anthony
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 1210
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: 202.293.0801
Fax: 202.293.0903

PATRICK W. RYAN
Editor-in-Chief, GulfWire 
mailto:gulfwire@ArabiaLink.com
 
C. R. TRISDALE
Deputy Editor, GulfWire 
mailto:CRTrisdale@ArabiaLink.com
 
PETER M. WALTON
Contributing Editor 
mailto:Pete@ArabiaLink.com
 

The GulfWire e-newsletter and Web site are developed, produced and
maintained by Ryan & Associates.

Copyright © 2002, GulfWire
All rights reserved.

The contents of this newsletter may not be reproduced in any commercial
document or in any material sold, nor used in any other manner without
permission of GulfWire.  Links to Internet sites should not be seen as an
endorsement of the sites, or the information contained in them.
 

 

 


Link To Amazon.com From Here When You Shop To Support The GulfWire Companion Website, Thanks!

Contact Info: info@ArabiaLink.com


Copyright © 1999-2004

[About ArabiaLink ] [ Contact ArabiaLink ] [ Policy ]
Users of the ArabiaLink Web site are assumed to have read and agreed to our
  terms and conditions and legal disclaimer.